Do We Need a PFNOL? Your Claims Workflow Assumes a Normal Week

A catastrophe doesn't just raise claim volume. It hits the intake process with a sudden, concentrated surge that the everyday workflow was never sized for.

‍

It's a useful way to think about a problem most claims organizations feel every storm season but rarely name directly. A normal week trains the workflow for a normal week. Triage assumptions, routing logic, and adjuster capacity are all calibrated to a baseline that a CAT event breaks in a matter of hours, right when the exposure sitting in that inbox is highest.

‍

The workflow starts later than the risk does

‍

The moment a claim communication arrives is not the same moment a workflow actually starts processing it. Between those two points sits a gap, and that gap is where critical information stalls.

‍

That's a structural problem, not a people problem. The adjuster reading a demand letter or an intake email is one of a carrier's most valuable judgment resources. Asking that person to also be the triage layer for volume they didn't create means the highest-value work competes for time with work that never needed a judgment call at all.

‍

Two questions worth asking before the next event, not during it

‍

If your inbound volume tripled overnight, would you know within the hour which claims carry the most exposure?

‍

Can your team currently tell the difference between a claim that needs triage and a claim that needs an answer in the first sixty minutes?

‍

Most workflows can't answer either question today, and that's not a criticism of the people running them. It's a description of what happens when detection is built to happen downstream, after a claim file already exists, instead of at the point of receipt, when the information first arrives.

Do you think we need a PFNOL?  Click here to learn more about our FNOL intake

‍